HPotter Book 7
Okay, so how about this?
"'No!' roared Snape. . . (pg 603). . .'Potter belongs to the Dark Lord'"
What if Harry is the Horcrux? He'd be the "something Gryffindor."
Perhaps he has part of the soul of Voldemort, hence his ability to read Voldemort's moods? Very old, classic ending (most recently seen in The Matrix closing), where Harry must sacrifice himself in order to destroy the other. Only in success does Voldemort fail.
This advances the strong love/sacrifice theme begun with Lily and strengthened by Dumbledore (central theme of the series?).
Isn't the end of Book 6 a furthering of severing of relationships for Harry (Dumbledore, Ginny, and Hogwarts itself), a recurring pattern in Harry's life, which foreshadows greater solitude soon? Won't Hermione and Ron name their first child Harry in memorium? Will Ginny really become a Weird Sister who plays Quidditch for England?
Hmmmm....
Of course, one flaw is that moldy Voldy wouldn't have tried killing Harry in the cemetary at the end of #4 (the best one, btw). But what if that's why Voldemort needed Harry's blood especially, to reclaim part of his own soul? To access one of the Horcruxes?
Well, there you have it. Read it again soon, before Rowling's intellectual property lawyers serve me with a cease and desist order. . .
posted by erdecker @ 1:04 AM
1 Comments:
Dear Eric Decker:
It has come to my attention that you have made an unauthorized use of J.K. Rowling (the “client”)’s copyrighted work entitled [Harry Potter] (the "Work") which infringes upon the client’s future fair use. All rights have been reserved in the Work, first published in England and the United States of America in 1998 and have registered copyright therein both countries. Your work entitled “HPotter Book 7” is essentially identical to the Work and clearly used the Work as its basis. Specifically this would include references to “Horcrux” and “sacrifice.”
As you neither asked for nor received permission to use the Work as the basis for “HPotter Book 7” nor to make or distribute copies, including electronic copies, of same, I believe you have willfully infringed my rights under 17 U.S.C. Section 101 et seq. and could be liable for statutory damages as high as $150,000 as set forth in Section 504(c)(2) therein.
I demand that you immediately cease the use and distribution of all infringing works derived from the Work, and all copies, including electronic copies, of same, that you deliver to me, if applicable, all unused, undistributed copies of same, or destroy such copies immediately and that you desist from this or any other infringement of my rights in the future. If I have not received an affirmative response from you by August 19, 2005, indicating that you have fully complied with these requirements, I shall take further action against you.
Very truly yours,
Samuel Fitzgerald, Esq.
Arthur A. Levine Books
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home